Anti-Autoresearch 是一款开源工具,用于审计学术论文的自我一致性与造假迹象,通过证据账本、LLM 提出的发现和确定性裁决器生成可供审稿人使用的报告。

Stars

114

7 天增长

暂无数据

Fork 数

4

开放 Issue

0

开源协议

MIT

最近更新

2026-07-14

AI 仓库情报摘要
FR-AI / ANALYSIS

为什么值得关注

它针对日益严重的不可靠机器生成论文问题,提供了一套原则性强的确定性审计系统,避免不透明的 AI 文本分类,转而检查事实一致性——该工具基于经过验证的 ARIS 平台(12.5k★)和包含 46 种完整性模式的已发表分类体系。

适合谁使用

  • 负责评审论文的审稿人与领域主席
  • 投稿前希望自我验证的作者
  • 会议程序委员会与科研诚信官
  • 研究可重复性和科研诚信的研究人员

典型使用场景

  • 在评审过程中审计论文的数字、引用或方法不一致
  • 在 L2 观察级别下核对论文声明与代码和结果的一致性
  • 为处于 rebuttal 或修改阶段的论文生成结构化完整性报告
  • 批量筛查多篇投稿中的潜在造假迹象

项目优势

  • 证据账本将每项发现锚定到论文中的具体哈希跨度,避免模糊指控
  • 确定性裁决器(纯规则)计算最终结论,LLM 不评判自身输出
  • 观察级别(L0、L1、L2)自动降级仅 PDF 可用时需代码支持的发现
  • 基于经过实战检验的 ARIS 审计堆栈(12.5k★,Hugging Face 每日第一),并配有评估框架和回归测试

使用前须知

  • 输出仅为供人工审查的标记,绝非不当行为的证据
  • 仅 PDF 模式(L0)可捕获不一致和表面迹象,但无法验证外部真实情况或运行代码
  • 存在误报(如合理的整数);分类体系为动态文档,对手可绕过已知信号

README 快速开始

Anti-Autoresearch 🛡️

· · · · · · · ·

🔬 The field has tolerated unreliable autoresearch long enough — Anti-Autoresearch is the read that finally catches it.

天下苦 autoresearch 久矣 —— Anti-Autoresearch 替研究者们一眼看穿不靠谱的工作。

🏆 Built on a battle-tested foundation: ARIS (~12.5k★ · HuggingFace Daily Papers #1 · 78+ skills across 7+ platforms). Anti-Autoresearch points ARIS's production audit DNA (experiment-audit · paper-claim-audit · citation-audit · kill-argument) outward — auditing a third party's submission instead of your own.

Autoresearch has gone mainstream, and a fast-growing share of what reaches the review pile is machine-generated — and a lot of it doesn't hold up: tables that don't match the text, baselines that aren't there, open-sourced code that won't reproduce its own paper. Reviewers, area chairs, and honest authors increasingly need to verify that, not just suspect it.

Regardless of who or what wrote a paper, does the science hold together and reflect its own evidence? Anti-Autoresearch audits a submission for self-consistency and fabrication, and produces a span-anchored, reviewer-ready report. It is not an opaque AI-text classifier (no authorship probabilities, no "AI-written" verdict) and does not judge misconduct — it surfaces discrepancies a human reviewer should investigate. Separately, it lists transparent, itemized AI writing-style impressions in a quarantined, zero-verdict-weight section (a paper can be integrity-CLEAN while listing many), because reviewers react to them.


🧭 What's inside

46 integrity patterns across 8 families — the coverage vocabulary every finding cites — plus 13 zero-weight AI writing-style impressions and 2 advisories:

FamilyCatches
ANumeric self-consistency数值自洽:table vs text vs delta arithmetic that doesn't add up
BMethod & scope方法与范围:the described method/scope ≠ wh

项目描述

Don't trust an autoresearch paper at face value. Reviewer-side integrity forensics — self-consistency + fabrication checks across 39 hack-patterns (7 families), deterministic verdict. Not an AI-text detector. The dual of ARIS.

相关仓库与替代方案

根据分类、Topic 和编程语言匹配的相似项目。

lopopolo
精选
lopopolo GitHub avatar

harness-engineering

Harness Engineering is a methodology for improving coding agent outputs by carefully crafting the environment around them—providing curated context, tools, and executable constraints that encode an organization’s nonfunctional requirements and cumulative lessons.

AI 与机器学习AI 智能体
2,390
slvDev
精选
slvDev GitHub avatar

esp32-ai

A 28.9 million parameter language model runs on an $8 ESP32-S3 microcontroller entirely on-device, generating simple stories at about 9.5 tokens per second.

AI 与机器学习大语言模型
1,960
littledivy
精选
littledivy GitHub avatar

mimic

mimic captures traffic from any iOS or web app and automatically generates a Python client library that lets you call the app's API like a regular library.

AI 与机器学习
1,482