🏆 Built on a battle-tested foundation: ARIS (~12.5k★ · HuggingFace Daily Papers #1 · 78+ skills across 7+ platforms). Anti-Autoresearch points ARIS's production audit DNA (experiment-audit · paper-claim-audit · citation-audit · kill-argument) outward — auditing a third party's submission instead of your own.
Autoresearch has gone mainstream, and a fast-growing share of what reaches the review
pile is machine-generated — and a lot of it doesn't hold up: tables that don't
match the text, baselines that aren't there, open-sourced code that won't reproduce
its own paper. Reviewers, area chairs, and honest authors increasingly need to
verify that, not just suspect it.
Regardless of who or what wrote a paper, does the science hold together and
reflect its own evidence? Anti-Autoresearch audits a submission for
self-consistency and fabrication, and produces a span-anchored,
reviewer-ready report. It is not an opaque AI-text classifier (no authorship
probabilities, no "AI-written" verdict) and does not judge misconduct — it surfaces
discrepancies a human reviewer should investigate. Separately, it lists transparent,
itemized AI writing-style impressions in a quarantined, zero-verdict-weight
section (a paper can be integrity-CLEAN while listing many), because reviewers react to them.