A repository that criticizes the phantom-solver project (now removed) and its developer ccy for delivering an AI-generated, poorly designed CAPTCHA solver without understanding fundamental security principles.

Stars

3

7-day growth

No data

Forks

0

Open issues

0

License

MIT

Last updated

2026-07-29

AI repository intelligence
FR-AI / ANALYSIS

Why it is worth attention

It publicly documents technical flaws in a popular CAPTCHA defense project, highlights the dangers of blindly trusting AI-generated code, and sparks debate about the quality of vibe-coded open-source projects.

Who it is for

  • Developers interested in CAPTCHA security
  • AI-assisted coding practitioners
  • Open-source community members concerned about code quality
  • Researchers studying AI-generated software flaws

Use cases

  • Understanding the actual weaknesses of phantom-solver's anti-CV/VLM design
  • Learning why passing file paths to the frontend is insecure in CAPTCHA systems
  • Using as a case study for the risks of over-reliance on AI in programming

Strengths

  • Points out specific code-level issues (different noise frequencies, frontend path exposure) with evidence from commit history
  • Shows screenshots of blocked communication as proof of the developer's reaction
  • Emphasizes the need for independent thinking and code review when using AI tools

Considerations

  • The repository contains no actual code or alternative implementation
  • The tone is highly emotional and may reduce objectivity
  • Claims cannot be independently verified because the original phantom-solver repository has been taken down

README quick start

phantom = dogshit

截止 2026/7/29 17:59 原仓库 Gaimoydev/phantom-solver 好像ccy先生有点急给原仓库举报掉了。所以将不会释放solver有关的代码在本仓库中。

邮件原文:

Access to the Gaimoydev/phantom-solver repository has been disabled by GitHub staff due to a terms of service violation.

When making content moderation decisions, we consider information from a variety of sources, including: account profile data, information contained in submitted reports/notices or discovered through our own voluntarily initiated investigations, and context around the contents of the repository.

If you wish to regain access to the disabled content or would like to dispute that a violation occurred and can provide additional information to show that a different decision should have been reached, please review our Appeal and Reinstatement Policy and submit a request via our form.

You may review our terms of service here: GitHub's Terms of Service

Please feel free to Contact GitHub Support if you have any questions.

对cyy先生说的话

既然您在releases中提到了还有人自己做仓库破解我的项目,在仓库里大肆辱骂嘲讽,同时在我发布了事实分析后,您又急于通过检举/举报的方式直接将原分析仓库举报下架,那我认为非常有必要做出一次回应。

事实证明,您对待技术质询的态度,和您的内心一样不堪一击,像极了一条被踩中尾巴后只敢躲在角落里无能狂怒的丧家之犬开始玩起了文字狱的手段。

在视频下连夜删评拉黑,最后再偷偷跑去github提交滥用举报,事实从来不需要靠report来打掩护。你连半点技术细节都拿不出来,只能靠下三滥的手段去 解决提出问题的人 ,这种狗急跳墙的破防废物姿态,像极了你那层伪装成开发者的脸皮。

您以为抹去所有的质疑声,您那漏洞百出的项目就能变成神作了吗?这种 解决不了技术问题就解决提出问题的人 的手段,不仅暴露了您底层认知的匮乏,更证明了您内心的虚弱。只有完全不懂代码、对底层原理一无所知的人,才需要靠打告状信和打造信息茧房来给自己带来精神高潮上的自慰。

删得掉仓库,改变不了事实;捂得住嘴巴,掩盖不了你废物残疾的事实。您的这一系列应激反应,除了向所有人证明您的项目只是一个靠ai幻觉和文案泡沫堆砌出来的劣质玩具外,什么也证明不了。

哦对了,看您在各处文案里三句不离初中生。看来您语言组织能力确实也就只有初中水平了。

首先说明一点:本人并不反对任何vibe,我作为国内早批使用ai作为自己开发工作流一环的人(22-23年),我没这个权利去反对任何人使用ai来实现自己的想法/帮助工作。

但是,我或者说其他开发者,深感厌恶的是:缺乏基础常识、无法理解代码含义、甚至连提示词都无法准确表达,却盲目自信且无脑交付项目的人

我从不排斥零基础小白借助ai去实现想法,这本是普通人接触编程最好的契机。但我极不希望看到 GitHub 上充斥着越来越多低质、缺乏思考的无脑vibe项目。

以往普通ask式的ai(早期chatgpt、deepseek),只能通过问答形式来告诉你对应的代码和操作流程。但至少在使用的过程中你会去打开ide去复制粘贴代码,会跟着步骤一步一步去操作,日积月累自然也就慢慢学会了越来越多的知识和学懂了一门语言。

但是现在不一样了,有了agent,有的人不屑于打开ide甚至连ai编写的代码都不看一眼。这种全自动的方式不仅没有让人学到任何东西,反而让人失去了在大脑中构建整体程序思路与架构的能力。

而很明显ccy先生就是这一类人,从仓库中的README: 让逐帧分析的 CV/VLM 直接失效或[issues#7中您的回复](http

Description

ccy先生好像有点急,把原仓库phantom-solver举报掉了。

Related repositories

Similar projects matched by category, topics, and programming language.

MoonshotAI
Featured
MoonshotAI GitHub avatar

Kimi-K3

Kimi K3 is an open-weight, 2.8T-parameter native multimodal agentic model with a 1M-token context window, designed for frontier coding, knowledge work, and reasoning tasks.

AI & Machine LearningAI Agents
3,348
lopopolo
Featured
lopopolo GitHub avatar

harness-engineering

Harness Engineering is a methodology for improving coding agent outputs by carefully crafting the environment around them—providing curated context, tools, and executable constraints that encode an organization’s nonfunctional requirements and cumulative lessons.

AI & Machine LearningAI Agents
2,390
slvDev
Featured
slvDev GitHub avatar

esp32-ai

A 28.9 million parameter language model runs on an $8 ESP32-S3 microcontroller entirely on-device, generating simple stories at about 9.5 tokens per second.

AI & Machine LearningLarge Language Models
1,960